PUTRAJAYA (Feb 15): The Court of Appeal here yesterday set March 11 and 12 to hear four appeals by former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak (pictured) to reverse a High Court’s ruling over the interlocutory applications in Najib’s seven criminal charges relating to SRC International Sdn Bhd funds totalling RM42 million.
KUALA LUMPUR (Feb 11): The case of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak involving three additional charges of money laundering to the tune of RM27 million of SRC International funds will be heard in the High Court.
KUALA LUMPUR (Feb 11): The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) will stick fast to the government’s directives so long as they are lawful, so that all the trials involving SRC International Sdn Bhd, 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) and other cases involving the “kleptocracy government” can commence as scheduled.
KUALA LUMPUR (Feb 11): The High Court is scheduled tomorrow to begin hearing cases involving former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who has been slapped with dozens of charges relating to money laundering, criminal breach of trust (CBT) and corruption.
PUTRAJAYA (Feb 8): Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak (pictured) has filed an application to stay his trial relating to charges over SRC International Sdn Bhd funds, which is scheduled to commence on Tuesday (Feb 12).
PUTRAJAYA (Feb 8): Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak (pictured) has filed an appeal to quash a High Court ruling granting the public prosecutor to withdraw a certificate to transfer his seven charges over SRC International funds amounting to RM42 million from the Sessions Court to the High Court.
PUTRAJAYA (Jan 23): The Court of Appeal has set two days beginning Feb 7 to hear three appeals by former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak (pictured) involving interlocutory matters in connection with his criminal charges over funds belonging to SRC International Sdn Bhd.
KUALA LUMPUR (Jan 18): The prosecution in Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s SRC International trial has vigorously objected to the defence’s request for postponement of the trial, saying that the application is “frivolous and would cause an unreasonable delay to the scheduled trial”.