Ku Nan rages in court over RM900m asset revelation after private hearing bid rejected

KUALA LUMPUR (March 4): Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor’s (pictured) application to have his asset declarations be heard in-camera was rejected by the High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan.

In making his judgement, Justice Mohamed Zaini said trial proceedings must not only be done fairly but must also be seen to be conducted fairly and transparently.

“The public have the right to see what court sees and what decisions are being made in the court. I therefore conclude that the defence have not made a case in their application,” he said.

Earlier, Tengku Adnan’s lawyer Datuk Tan Hock Chuan made an application to have a section of Tengku Adnan’s examination-in-chief conducted in-camera because he wanted to tender four documents on his asset declaration, which are deemed sensitive information.

An in-camera proceeding is a private hearing with the judge in the absence of the public and reporters.

Tan argued that the tendering of these four documents are important in Tengku Adnan’s defence as they will prove that the accused did not need the RM2 million purported bribe considering his financial status.

The examination-in-chief subsequently continued with Tan proceeding to ask Tengku Adnan, also known as Ku Nan, about his asset declarations, to which the accused revealed that he had over RM900 million in assets as at 2001.

The witness previously testified that he had made four asset declarations to the prime minister in four separate years, and that his reason for referring to these declarations was to show that he was financially comfortable and had no intention to receive RM2 million political donation for his own use.

Tan then went on to ask the witness whether the RM2 million given by businessman Tan Sri Chai Kin Kong was connected in any way to his official function as Federal Territories Minister, to which he said no.

Later, Deputy Public Prosecutor Julia Ibrahim began her cross-examination of the witness.

However it was cut short after a brief heated exchange between the two.

Julia: Referring to paragraph 8 of your statement, you said “Unfortunately, there is a lot of jealousy and many people would like to see Tadmansori Holdings Sdn Bhd (Tengku Adnan’s company) collapse. Even today, they are tarnishing me so that in the business circles I will look bad. This group never realised that Tadmansori Holdings Sdn Bhd has a strong foundation and fundamentals. I do not care about my political position as what I did politically was for the best interest of my country and rakyat.”

I put it to you that this was your personal opinion.

Tengku Adnan began to raise his voice in disagreement to the suggestion, to which Julia asked the witness to calmly agree or disagree.

Julia: This is a cross-examination, you may agree or disagree with my question.

Tengku Adnan: No I disagree!

You see now I have a problem because after I mentioned the (almost) RM1 billion then they will want to sensationalise. Now I am deprived!

Tengku Adnan has been charged under Section 165 of the Penal Code for accepting RM2 million from Aset Kayamas Sdn Bhd managing director Chai via a Hong Leong Islamic Bank cheque belonging to his company.

It was reported that the cheque was deposited into the CIMB Bank account of Tadmansori Holdings on June 14, 2016, when it was known that Aset Kayamas had links to Tengku Adnan's official duties as the then federal territories minister.

Trial was subsequently adjourned for the day and will resume tomorrow.

Click here for more property stories

Looking for properties to buy or rent? With >150,000 exclusive listings, including undervalued properties, from vetted Pro Agents, you can now easily find the right property on Malaysia's leading property portal EdgeProp! You can also get free past transacted data and use our proprietary Edge Reference Price tool, to make an informed purchase.
  1. Termination letter issued to Dhaya Maju over KVDT2 project
  2. Azwanddin turns up in court, arrest warrant cancelled
  3. FGV suit against Isa Samad, Emir Mavani: Defendants object to witness statement