
The Malaysian government’s Urban Renewal Act (URA) has become one of the most contentious pieces of draft legislations in recent years. Designed to accelerate the redevelopment of ageing or under-utilised urban land, the URA has prompted intense debate about property rights, constitutional protections, and socio-economic effects.
Much of the discussion has centred on Malaysian owners, but foreign residents, especially Malaysia My 2nd Home (MM2H) visa holders who own properties, also need to understand how the URA might affect them
The main contention of the URA is allowing properties to be redeveloped even when not all owners consent. Under the draft URA Bill:
Government supporters say the URA will help rejuvenate old housing stock, unlock urban land value, and modernise cities. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has publicly assured the people that the Act will not result in forced evictions or alter land status for original owners.
However, many urban planners, community groups, legal experts, and property associations argue that the Act, in its current form, risks eroding constitutional property protections, and undermining minority ownership rights.
One of the most contentious points is why the age for properties allowed for redevelopment is set as low as 30 years? There appears to be no logical answer, as properly-maintained properties in Malaysia and elsewhere in the world will last a considerable time.

Under MM2H, foreign retirees and long-term residents gain a renewable visa by meeting financial requirements, which include investing in Malaysian property.
MM2H visa holders:
Given this, any change to property law such as the URA could have direct consequences for MM2H holders who own properties, subject to redevelopment or renewal designations.
1. Vulnerability to compulsory acquisition
If a property falls within a designated urban renewal zone, and receives sufficient consent from other owners, the URA could allow redevelopment to proceed without unanimous agreement.
For MM2H holders, this could mean:
In short: foreign owners with minority interests in strata buildings may find themselves particularly vulnerable to redevelopment decisions made by majority-owner consensus.
2. Compensation and property type concerns
One of the most debated aspects of the URA is how compensation will be structured. Some supporters have suggested one-for-one replacement or upgraded property offers for owners within a renewal zone. Critics warn compensation may not reflect equivalent market value, especially for unique landed homes versus high-density replacement units.
For MM2H holders, this raises a few considerations:
3. Constitutional protections and legal recourse
Malaysia’s constitution provides property rights under Article 13, requiring that no person be deprived of property without adequate compensation. However, legal experts and civil society groups argue the URA’s consent thresholds and redevelopment mechanisms risk weakening these safeguards:
MM2H holders, especially non-resident owners, could face additional jurisdictional and procedural hurdles in asserting their rights or challenging renewal decisions.
4. Market and investment implications
Even without compulsory actions, the mere existence of the URA regime may shift property market dynamics:
The URA represents a paradigm shift in Malaysian property law, one that prioritises redevelopment and urban densification, but also raises difficult questions about individual property rights.
For MM2H visa holders, though their property ownership is not automatically stripped, it may be subjected to speculative URA.
MM2H participants must not be subjected to forced redevelopment. Their homes are their lives; not speculative assets.
However, if your investment lies within a designated renewal area, you could be subject to redevelopment pressures, majority-consent mechanisms, and legal obligations you may not fully control. Politicking will surely rear its ugly head.
The MM2H community is facing one of the most serious threats in its 20-year history. The proposed URA legislation, especially the widely discussed 30-year redevelopment benchmark, has triggered deep anxiety among thousands of foreign retirees who have made Malaysia their home. This is not a minor administrative issue. It is a direct threat to the security of retirement homes, long-term residency stability, and Malaysia’s reputation as a trustworthy place for foreign retirees. A policy vacuum is now harming Malaysia’s international credibility.
And today, the MM2H Association must take a strong and public stand. The Ministry of Tourism, Arts & Culture, and the expats’ clubs must be alerted of the ramification and repercussions of the urban renewal laws. The very future of the MM2H programme hangs in the balance. Every day without clarification allows fear to spread, forums to speculate and confidence to deteriorate.
John Butler is a British national, who has been an MM2H visa holder and property owner since 2005, and a frequent visitor to Malaysia in the last 50 years.
The article has been edited for clarity. The views expressed are the writer’s and do not necessarily reflect EdgeProp’s.
Unlock Malaysia’s shifting industrial map. Track where new housing is emerging as talents converge around I4.0 industrial parks across Peninsular Malaysia. Download the Industrial Special Report now.
Sign up to get breaking news, unique insights, event invites and more from EdgeProp.
The only property app you need. More than 200,000 sale/rent listings and daily property news.
