lifestyle

This year’s Fire Monkey ain’t too hot...

Fire Monkey

Terrence YapTHE Chinese zodiac is based on a 12-year cycle, with each year in the cycle representing an animal sign. This cycle is combined with a rotation of the five elements -- wood, fire, earth, metal and water.

This year’s animal is the fire monkey, while 2004 was the year of the wood monkey.

So, how does the property market look this year compared with a dozen years ago?

According to the National Property Information Centre, prices of residential property showed healthy growth in 2004. The all houses price index (IHRM) was 113.0 compared with 107.7 in 2003, recording a y-o-y house price index growth of 4.8%, up from 4.0% in 2003.

Meanwhile, the IHRM in 2014 was 211 as compared with 192.8 in year 2012, recording a y-o-y change of 7.4%, down from 11.6% in 2013.

So, what contributed to the healthy market in 2004?

According to One Sunterra Properties Sdn Bhd agency head Terence Yap, a major economic stimulus package of RM7.3 billion by the government in 2003 to boost the sluggish economy and the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic contributed to the growth of the property market. “This has resulted in positive indicators, which included stronger foreign and domestic demand, growth in the private sector, higher disposable income and rebound in consumer confidence,” Yap tells TheEdgeProperty.com.

Elvin FernandezMeanwhile, the general election in 2004 may also explain the somewhat elevated growth rates for the first two quarters of the year, said Khong & Jaafar Sdn Bhd managing director Elvin Fernandez.

“The polling day was in fact on March 13, 2004, which explained the first two quarters’ healthy economic situation – due to the possible extra activity and expenditures during that time,” he added.

The stock market also performed well in 2004, said Fernandez, with a 15.08% increase in market movement. In comparison, the market in 2015 slowed by 3.44%.

“The retail sector, such as the shopping centres, was generally on the upside, and the years after 2004 saw real estate investment trusts (REITs) focusing on the retail sector,” he said.

According to property services firm Rahim & Co International Sdn Bhd, there will be an upcoming supply of eight million sq ft of office space over the next four years and incoming supply of seven to eight million sq ft of retail space over the same period.

Currently, the total KL office space supply is 88.9 million sq ft, with average occupancy rate remaining healthy at 81%. 

However, the absorption rate of office space is expected to slow, increasing vacancy rates, Rahim and Co's research team noted.

Yap said the property market outlook appears cautious this year owing to anticipated higher unemployment rate and inflation as well as stricter lending policies.

“Some buyers are facing a challenge in obtaining loans for their property purchases while others are adopting a wait and see approach before committing to any purchase,” Yap shared.

According to Napic’s 1H2015 report, the number of housing approvals for construction (as approved by the Ministry of Urban Wellbeing, Housing and Local Government) have declined since 1H2012, with the exception of 1H2014.

Napic also noted a y-o-y decrease in the number of loan applications for the purchase of residential properties by 24.3% in 1H2015, while loan approvals fell by 25.8%. In comparison, loan applications in 1H2014 dipped 3.1% from a year ago, while loan approvals rose by 4.3%.

Meanwhile, loan applications and approvals in 1H2015 for non-residential properties saw double-digit contractions of 20.4% and 25.6% y-o-y, respectively.

The downtrend indicators in market activity, loan applications and approvals indicate a slowdown in the market, Napic said.

Fernandez concurred: “With the ringgit’s substantial depreciation and the cooling measures on the property market by the central bank, lending for mortgage loans is strict as warranted by the high household debt.”

The persistent oversupply may also result in substantial weakness in the commercial sectors of the market, he added.

“In a nutshell, this monkey year may not look as good as the previous one,” he concluded.

 

Table 1: All houses price index for 3Q2003-2004 and 3Q2013-2015 (IHRM) (NAPIC)

Period 3Q2003 3Q2004 3Q2013 3Q2014 3Q2015
All houses price index (IHRM) 110.6 113.4 198.0 213.6 225.2

Table 2: All houses prices for3Q2003-2004 and 3Q2013-2015 (NAPIC)

Period 3Q2003 3Q2004 3Q2013 3Q2014 3Q2015
All houses prices (RM) 152,760 156,638 274,351 296,042 312,050 (p)

(p) - preliminary

Table 3: Gross domestic product growth y-o-y in Malaysia (Khong and Jaafar and International Monetary Fund, IMF)

Period 2004 2014 2015 (f) 2016 (f1)
Gross domestic product (GDP) growth y-o-y (%) 6.8 5.99 4.5 - 5.5 4.0 - 4.5

(f): Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) economic forecast        (f1): Forecast during Budget 2016 Recalibration

Table 4: Stock market movement in Malaysia (Yahoo Finance)

Period 2004 2015
Stock market index (Beginning) 793.94 1752.77
Stock market index (Closing) 907.43 1692.51
Percentage change (%) +14.29 -3.44

Table 5: Existing shopping complexes: Total and occupied spaces in Malaysia (NAPIC)

Period Total Space (sq m) Space occupied (sq m) Occupancy rate (%)
2004 7.17 million 5.7 million 79.4
2014 13.0 million 10.6 million 81.3

Table 6: Existing purpose built office: Total and occupied spaces in Malaysia (government and private building) (NAPIC)

Period Total Space (sq m) Space occupied (sq m) Occupancy rate (%)
2004 14.2 million 11.6 million 81.2
2014 19.6 million 16.6 million 84.9

Table 7: Unemployment rate in Malaysia. (2004 data from Department of Statistics Malaysia, projection for 2016 from Trading Economics)

Period 2004 1Q2016 (p) 2Q2016 (p) 3Q2016 (p) 4Q2016 (p)
Unemployment Rate (%) 3.5 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2

(p) - projection

Table 8: Inflation rate in Malaysia (International Monetary Fund, IMF)

Period 2004 2014
Inflation rate (average consumer prices) 1.42 3.14

Table 9: Volume and value of property transactions in Malaysia (NAPIC)

Period Volume of transaction (‘000) Change in volume of transaction (%, y-o-y) Value (RM, billion) Change in value (%, y-o-y)
2004 293.21 20.5 59.96 38.1
2014 384.06 0.8 162.97 10.2
1H2015 186.70 -3.5 (against 1H2014) 76.61 -6.6 (against 1H2014)

 

If you have any feng shui-related questions for Joey Yap, please click here to go to the Tips section of TheEdgeProperty.com

Do not ask your mother-in-law about the value of your home. Click here at The Edge Reference Price to find out.

Looking for properties to buy or rent? With >150,000 exclusive listings, including undervalued properties, from vetted Pro Agents, you can now easily find the right property on Malaysia's leading property portal EdgeProp! You can also get free past transacted data and use our proprietary Edge Reference Price tool, to make an informed purchase.
SHARE
RELATED POSTS
  1. Sluggish property market conditions to continue in 2020 — analysts
  2. 重点报道:巴生房产需求稳健 城镇计划受青睐
  3. Budget 2020: Rahim and Co cautions potential home buyers to not take on too much debt, has neutral outlook on Budget 2020