Urban Renewal Act reproposal must spell out compensation provisions—legal expert
PETALING JAYA (Feb 6): Clear compensation provisions must be stipulated in the Urban Renewal Act, says a legal expert.
PETALING JAYA (Feb 6): Clear compensation provisions must be stipulated in the Urban Renewal Act, says a legal expert.
KUALA LUMPUR (Jan 23): The National House Buyers Association (HBA) of Malaysia today stated its appreciation and gratitude to the Cabinet for its decision to retract the Urban Redevelopment Bill (URA).
PETALING JAYA (Jan 22): The National House Buyers Association Malaysia (HBA) has welcomed the move to require greater disclosure and early consultation in urban development, and stresses that democratic participation must take place before decisions affecting communities are finalised.
The proposal to use a 30-year building age as a redevelopment trigger under the Urban Renewal Act (URA) Bill (now in Parliament) remains fundamentally unsound, even with the Housing and Local Government (KPKT) Minister Nga Kor Ming’s latest suggestion of “reviewing” it.
The proposed Property Management Bill is a costly and unnecessary duplication of BOVAEP’s existing mandate.
What KL needs isn't new laws, renewal or redevelopment legislation; it needs an awakened civic consciousness, meaningful education, and robust social care.
Unless substantial amendments are made or both legislations are forthwith withdrawn, they risk undermining property rights, community participation, and the democratic governance of the city of KL.
While the Federal Territories Minister’s emphasis on the need for balanced development—including supporting infrastructures, education, amenities, green spaces, transport, and proper planning—is commendable, the reality does not match her words.
Datuk Chang Kim Loong: "For the average Malaysian, we have repeatedly said, owning a home is not just a dream but the largest financial commitment of a lifetime.
Civil proceedings should be commenced to recover the millions in waived penalties, as the developer had unfairly benefitted from the sale of these properties and had obtained “unlawful enrichment”.