KUALA LUMPUR (April 11): The Federal Land Development Authority’s (Felda) planned review of its 99-year land lease agreement (LLA) with FGV Holdings Bhd, is not expected to work out well for FGV, which is heavily reliant on Felda’s resources.

“It will be negative to FGV’s earnings, should Felda amend the terms in the existing LLA and require FGV to pay higher lease for the land. But, at this juncture, it is unclear if Felda can amend the terms of the LLA easily,” regional head of plantations research at CIMB Investment Bank Ivy Ng told The Edge Financial Daily when contacted.

If Felda decides to terminate the LLA — which the White Paper on Felda yesterday revealed has been detrimental to the government agency — then it would have to compensate FGV in accordance with agreement’s terms and conditions, said Ng.

“We are unable to estimate at this juncture the earnings impact for FGV in the event the LLA is terminated, as we are not able to ascertain the compensation amount.

“However, we do think that if this happens, it is likely to be negative for FGV, as they will be losing one of their key earnings contributors as a large portion of past FGV earnings are derived from the estates it leases from Felda,” Ng added.

According to FGV’s 2017 annual report, the group has 334,595ha of planted palm oil estates in Malaysia, and 12,519ha rubber estates. It also states that under the LLA it inked with Felda in November 2011, the leased land comprises both planted oil palm and rubber areas. Based on previous news reports, the LLA involves some 320,000ha.

A local analyst, who declined to be named, concurred that the development is not good news for FGV. But one way for both to resolve the matter without affecting other shareholders too much would be to take FGV, which has been listed on the Main Market of Bursa Malaysia since June 2012, private.

“If the revision is to proceed, the easy way out would be privatisation. Take the company private before revising the terms so that minority shareholders can be out of the picture,” the analyst said.

The analyst added that any upward revision of Felda’s profit-sharing portion from the existing 15% would translate into lesser profits for FGV shareholders.

“As a shareholder, why would I want to agree to such terms? They could take back the land, but that makes little sense. FGV would be left with next to nothing since that would mean pretty much all of its Malaysian estates are subject to the agreement,” the analyst said.

Interestingly, FGV’s share price rose yesterday amid active trade of 57.08 million shares. The stock rose as much as eight sen or 6.3% to RM1.34 within the first hour of trading, ahead of the tabling of the White Paper in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday.

It eventually pared most of the earlier gains to finish the day at RM1.30 — still up four sen or 3.2% — and remained on Bursa Malaysia’s most active list throughout. On a year-to-date basis, the stock has risen about 82%.

During the debate on Felda’s White Paper in Parliament yesterday, Minister of Economic Affairs Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali announced that Felda will be reviewing the LLA it has with FGV, to seek a better deal for all involved. Felda is FGV’s major shareholder with a 33.7% stake.

“Felda is in discussion with the management of FGV to relook the terms of the agreements that have been agreed upon previously so that they will benefit all parties, particularly the settlers,” he said.

During his speech, Mohamed Azmin said Felda should receive an annual payment of RM248 million plus a 15% share of plantation profit generated from the 99-year lease of its commercial land.

Felda, however, only received an average of RM400 million a year from FGV, versus the minimum requirement of RM800 million per year to manage the plantations and to ensure the livelihood of settlers. — theedgemarkets.com

Click here for more property stories.

SHARE
RELATED POSTS
  1. Auditor general flags going concern issues at Felda, PR1MA
  2. Anwar: Govt guarantee essential to restructure Felda's debt, ensure sustainability
  3. Felda to review abandoned settlers' housing projects that are 60% completed or less — Azalina