News about legal

The building, owned by former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin and his widow Toh Puan Na’imah Abdul Khalid, is subject to two forfeiture proceedings by the MACC, which are being challenged.

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia on Wednesday, the auditors said the company was unable to provide fundamental accounting records and supporting documentation necessary for their audit procedures.

Advancecon said its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advancecon Infra Sdn Bhd, was awarded RM7 million following proceedings administered by the Asian International Arbitration Centre.

The residents’ counsel, Datuk Rosal Azimin Ahmad, said that one of the grounds for the dismissal was that the eviction had already been executed.

High Court judge Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan allowed Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil and the government’s application to strike out the suit on the grounds that Asian Kitchen had no legal right to bring suits over concession agreements it was not party to.

In a bourse filing on Thursday, Taghill said it had received the adjudicator’s decision dated Sept 17, Wednesday, ordering Dreamlike Development to pay RM3.

In her supporting affidavit in the suit filed by Ilham Baru and Ilham Tower on Sept 9 against their company secretary, Rebecca Lee Ewe Ai, as the defendant, Na'imah said that the MACC does not have sufficient evidence in the forfeiture case against the tower, as evidenced by its order to compel the company secretary to produce more documents.

Ilham Tower, owned by former finance minister, the late Tun Daim Zainuddin, and his widow Toh Puan Na’imah Abdul Khalid, is subject to two forfeiture proceedings by the MACC, which are being challenged.

The property developer said its wholly-owned unit United Time Development Sdn Bhd is being sued by Kejuruteraan Berpadu Maju Sdn Bhd.

Judge Datuk Che Mohd Ruzima Mohd Ghazali, who led the bench, said the bench concluded that there is no wanton destruction of the subject matter of the said assets, and even if the appeal to institute an injunction is in favour of the applicants’ position, it would not disrupt the proceedings.